apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Hot or Not? Disney Garden Produce

2009_05_5-disney-celery.jpgDon't be too alarmed if you see mouse ears the next time you visit the produce department. It's not a rodent infestation – it's Disney's latest marketing venture.

The company's characters are now gracing the packaging of all sorts of fruits and vegetables – from apples and grapes to celery and cauliflower. What do you think? A good way to get kids to eat their fruits and vegetables or corporate branding overload?

 
 

2009_05_05-disney-apples.jpgDisney's healthy food branding effort goes beyond produce – in March, the company launched eggs with Mickey's face stamped on each shell. With its latest introductions, the company is also bringing some of its real-life stars into the mix with products like a High School Musical avocado.

According to the Washington Post, the Disney Garden line now includes 250 products, a selection of which are available in 18 of the top 20 U.S. grocery retailers.

2009_05_05-disney-cauliflower.jpg

Related: Hot or Not: Gourmet Kids' Play Kitchen

(Images: Dining in Disney)

Tags

Fruits and Vegetables, hot or not, Disney Garden

Related Links

Share

Comments (27)

If someone needs a Disney logo to feel comfortable with vegetables, I guess the end justifies the means.

posted by heather77 on May 5th 2009 at 11:07am
view heather77's profile

Ick. At least they could have a line of organic veggies, or maybe have all their profits going to fighting poverty and hunger, especially in the case of children. Otherwise, I'm sticking to local farms and homegrown veggies, whether my kids like it or not.

posted by ziacd on May 5th 2009 at 11:19am
view ziacd's profile

That Disney logo comes with a mark-up. My 3 year old has suddenly developed Princess Radar and instantly sees the product on the shelf with the Disney princess on it--and wants THAT one, of course. This is definitely NOT HOT in my book.

posted by cmcinnyc on May 5th 2009 at 11:23am
view cmcinnyc's profile

...so THAT'S why Tinkerbell was on the strawberries or whatever it was I bought the other day. I THOUGHT it was weird. Ehh. I vote not. But then, I suppose I'm not really the target market here, being in my early twenties and childless.

posted by PreludeInZ on May 5th 2009 at 11:38am
view PreludeInZ's profile

This is not great, but not horrible either. Like heather77 says - if it works, it works. But I do see cmcinnyc's point as well. No one wants to have a three year old who is having a meltdown in the produce aisle over the Pocahontas apples.

Now those Disney eggs on the other hand... those are just creepy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbuXOopbWcE

posted by hmr on May 5th 2009 at 11:39am
view hmr's profile

since when is the disney franchise feeling the financial pinch? ugh.

i agree with ziacd's comment.

posted by abigailbelle on May 5th 2009 at 12:06pm
view abigailbelle's profile

Once while on vacation in Florida I stopped in a grocery store to pick up some healthy snacks, and I really wanted those little cheese cubes. The only package that had the flavors I wanted was Disney! haha... I felt a little silly, but hey, it worked.

posted by UptownGirl on May 5th 2009 at 12:07pm
view UptownGirl's profile

Anyone else notice that rather than celery, it looks like Daisy Duck is firing a rifle?

posted by caliloud on May 5th 2009 at 12:24pm
view caliloud's profile

I have such mixed feelings about this. ON the one hand, if it gets kids to eat more veggies, then go for it. On the other hand, do we really need to let Disney brand EVERYTHING???

posted by KaraSP on May 5th 2009 at 12:24pm
view KaraSP's profile

maybe you can buy a bag of something once and reuse the bag to trick your kids into thinking they're disney brand. Kids tend to enjoy more food if it's branded/packaged according to their taste, so this might be good for a disney loving picky eater

posted by chusmabilly on May 5th 2009 at 12:30pm
view chusmabilly's profile

This is part of the repulsive trend to omnipresent advertising. Definitely NOT hot.

posted by angorian on May 5th 2009 at 12:39pm
view angorian's profile

Makes me ill. Why do veggies need packaging like that anyway? Red delicious? This is pathetic.

I'd vote "not" if the poll would let me, but the "answer survey" button remains stubbornly grayed out.

posted by Evan M on May 5th 2009 at 12:41pm
view Evan M's profile

I don't mind Disney endorsing veggies (at least they are plastering their characters on something other than pudding snacks and sugary cereal). However, this produce (at least in my experience) is quite a bit more expensive, then the non-Disney produce. I hate the idea of marking up a bag of apples a couple dollars because of Toy Story. If they could keep the prices closer to average and it helps kids eat their veggies, I don't care what is on my package of celery.

posted by Rolen the Great on May 5th 2009 at 12:43pm
view Rolen the Great's profile

@chusmabilly, you would need fairly dim children. They are wily, and cannot be fooled for long.

posted by cmcinnyc on May 5th 2009 at 12:47pm
view cmcinnyc's profile

you forgot to mention my fave: the zac efron avocado!!!

posted by FromTheFuture on May 5th 2009 at 12:48pm
view FromTheFuture's profile

caliloud--i totally thought the same thing immediately; she's totally holding a celery rifle. ridiculous.

posted by purdygirl on May 5th 2009 at 1:27pm
view purdygirl's profile

As goofy as this strikes the currently 25-year-old me, I think the 4-year-old me would have eaten these up (puns intended).

posted by akay on May 5th 2009 at 1:48pm
view akay's profile

Please. No child eats the packaging. My 2 year old loves fruits and veggies and thinks the produce section of the market is cool. Now all I need is Dora fruit with the markup.

posted by mbsings on May 5th 2009 at 2:29pm
view mbsings's profile

@Evan M - Red Delicious is an actual variety of apple, like Granny Smith or McIntosh, not a description of the apples in the bag. For all we know, those apples are not so delicious.

Can anyone offer specific figures on the costs?

posted by hmr on May 5th 2009 at 2:30pm
view hmr's profile

There is a term for this in marketing: 'cradle to grave'.

Baby wears disposable diapers with Mickey Mouse on them, grows up eating celery, apples, and eggs with Disney characters on them, asks to go to Disneyland/Disneyworld for family vacation, as a tween watches Disney kids shows and buys into the franchise (lunchboxes, clothes, and concert tickets). They then return to these same familiar icons for their children (buying the disposable Mickey diapers), remembering them fondly in a nostalgic way.

I think advertising to children is disgusting, regardless of whether or not it's on healthy food items. It's establishing brand loyalty in children, not necessarily establishing healthy eating habits.

posted by fade on violet on May 5th 2009 at 3:38pm
view fade on violet's profile

Perhaps these branded fruits and vegetables were designed to be eaten in Celebration, the branded Disney town!

Next up: Disney cemeteries!

posted by heather77 on May 5th 2009 at 4:09pm
view heather77's profile

Can I just say that I really happy that none of the places I shop carry this type of merchandise. It is particularly bad because the produce isn't even organic.

And I pay extra for diapers that *don't* have characters on them.

posted by JudiAU on May 5th 2009 at 4:45pm
view JudiAU's profile

It's both! If it helps get kids to eat cauliflower, great!

And it's right up Disney's alley; anyone old enough to remember all their wartime cartoons from the 40's and 50's?

posted by Lizliterarius on May 6th 2009 at 2:45am
view Lizliterarius's profile

Reminds me of this study - was this mentioned on the Kitchn? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29468137/

Name the carrots X-ray Vision Carrots and little kids will eat twice as many.

posted by LauraII on May 6th 2009 at 9:05am
view LauraII's profile

@ Lizliterarius How about their STI awareness cartoons (I think from the 60's)?

posted by Ermu on May 6th 2009 at 9:07am
view Ermu's profile

Personally, I think this is a great idea for people who have children that will not eat fruits or vegetables. I see this sort of along the same lines as sneaking pureed vegetables into a kid's food.

I'm sure that everyone hopes that their child will grow up and love fruits and veggies, but the reality is that many of them don't. And if you can get them to eat those by making them seem cool, then go for it.

Alot of my coworkers are trying to eat better, but they are all on budgets and their kids hate the food that they buy (ex: apples for snacks instead of cheese nips). So instead of buying hte healthy stuff, they usually end up choosing whatever the kids will it. If they can get the kids to learn to eat those things, they in turn are able to become healthier too.

To demonstrate a little further, my little step-sister goes to a preschool where ever other kid eats Disney-brand gummy fruit snacks or cartoon animal crackers every day. She gets upset because she has to eat the "boring" fruits that are packed in her lunch every day. I really think that having fun characters on the package will make kids thing that eating these foods is cool after all.

But of course if you're lucky enough to have a kid who loves going to the farmer's market anyway, there's really no point in buying the Disney stuff.

posted by npeterson86 on May 6th 2009 at 6:57pm
view npeterson86's profile

This is actually *nothing* new - in the '50s, Disney licensed loads of their characters to various companies (until recently, only Peter Pan peanut butter and Donald Duck orange juice remained) to fund their projects - including the construction of Disneyland.

While this is one way to get kids to eat their veggies, even the Disney shareholders in my family are cringing. Tacky, tacky, tacky.

posted by Stiletto on May 7th 2009 at 3:22pm
view Stiletto's profile