apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Cooking With Colostrum

2008_06_02-raw-colostrum.jpgFaced with a pint of raw cow's colostrum at the farmers' market last week in Santa Monica, I found it hard to not to say yes. So there I was with this pricey elixir and no idea what to do with it.

Colostrwhat? Colustrum is the first milk of a lactating being. In this case, a cow. It is packed with nutrients and antibodies. The only colustrum I'd seen before was my own, and believe me, I didn't cook with it.

I emailed my friend Nina Planck, figuring if anyone knew, she would. No dice. I started googling around, and found just a few references. Googling "colostrum recipes" mostly yields formulas for making a colustrum substitute for just-born calves.

I set out to make a pudding I found on an Icelandic cooking website, but ended up making cheese. The recipe, for those of you who care, will be posted tomorrow.

In the meantime, I'd love to hear if anyone has experience cooking with colostrum. And don't just say "ewww."

Tags

Dairy Products, Farmers' Market, raw milk, colostrum

Related Links

Share

Comments (28)

Whoa. Never heard of such a thing. Well my first thought is I wonder if heat will damage all those amazing antibodies and such. My second thought is I wonder how cow colostrum actually works for humans - given that each mammal's colostrum is perfectly formulated for that species' offspring, what does and doesn't work for us non-bovines? My third thought is how does it taste?

posted by mjoe on 2008-06-02 12:44:02
view mjoe's profile

I second mjoe. What does it taste like?

posted by TammyE on 2008-06-02 12:56:19
view TammyE's profile

What does the calf drink if you're drinking this?

posted by mollyjade on 2008-06-02 13:05:26
view mollyjade's profile

honestly, as a former nursing mom, I may have trouble just drinking milk after reading about this. Maybe you could put it over berries or something... I'll pass though..

posted by KrIbbit on 2008-06-02 13:19:23
view KrIbbit's profile

good question mollyjade. i'm not vegan, but hmmmm

posted by mjoe on 2008-06-02 13:22:47
view mjoe's profile

I can't say that I've ever cooked with colostrum, but for those so inclined:

http://www.westonaprice.org/foodfeatures/colostrum.html

posted by Julie on 2008-06-02 13:23:02
view Julie's profile

I really was just going to say "ewwww."

And I agree with mollyjade.

posted by Joan A. on 2008-06-02 13:28:04
view Joan A.'s profile

I was going to buy the milk for my son. But the milk and colostrom are unpasturized. So there isn't a problem with heating killing the antibodies. Unpasturized milk isn't really a worry if you are healthy person.

posted by charmesh on 2008-06-02 13:53:43
view charmesh's profile

what's the diff between this and raw milk?

posted by art on 2008-06-02 14:22:17
view art's profile

This elicits a giant eee-YUCK from me, too. And yes, I'm also confused about the calf. A cow (like a human) can produce milk indefinitely, but colostrum is pre-milk and is only produced for a few days (at least in humans, and I think in other mammels, too). So, uh, how does this work?

Not that I really want to know, actually, now that I think about it. Blech!

posted by cmcinnyc on 2008-06-02 14:23:55
view cmcinnyc's profile

Gross! Sorry, but I can't comprehend why anyone would eat this. Or drink it. I get sick just thinking about it.

The calf is taken away from its mother and closed up in a veal pen until it's ready for slaughter. Colostrom isn't really an issue.

Also, since most dairy cows are kept lactating or pregnant almost year-round, I don't know how many nutrients would be available for any given batch of colostrom.

posted by jooly on 2008-06-02 14:33:25
view jooly's profile

Jooly, I guess that is the obvious answer, I was just hoping for a more humane one. And you make a good point about the nutrients.

But ethical considerations aside, why all the ewwww? What makes colostrum any grosser, in theory, than milk?

posted by mjoe on 2008-06-02 14:40:30
view mjoe's profile

So does this mean veal calves are routinely fed antibiotics?

posted by mollyjade on 2008-06-02 14:52:14
view mollyjade's profile

I've heard of some hippie-dippy food products, but this - NEVER EVER. Is there even enough market for something like this to justify bottling it? Was it selling briskly?

posted by cakekick on 2008-06-02 15:03:48
view cakekick's profile

I guess in theory it's not any grosser than milk. I happen to think milk is gross too, though. I admit to being easily grossed-out.

posted by jooly on 2008-06-02 15:16:15
view jooly's profile

I think about 90% of what makes this "grosser than milk" is the name. Seriously, i got a screwed up look on my face reading this, even before i knew what it was! :)

posted by mh330 on 2008-06-02 15:56:58
view mh330's profile

I grew up on a dairy farm and I have to say EWWWWW!

I would never EVER touch the stuff. Straight up, it looked bloody. And lumpy. (This stuff is probably homogenized.) If you get it, I'll bet the color is really orange. Here's something to think about: 500 gallons of blood need to pass through the udder to make one gallon of milk.

mjoe: The truth is that the cows produce way more of this stuff than the calf needs. Especially the heavy lactaters. (A good cow would produce upwards of 10 gallons of milk per day.) Much of the time, we'd throw the excess into the gutter. Plus, some cow's milk is better than others, so we would feed to good stuff to the calves and discard the not so go stuff - or sell it to people at farmer's markets now, I guess.

However, we used to feed some of it to our cats, and they LOVED the stuff.

posted by cara_mia on 2008-06-02 16:01:46
view cara_mia's profile

I'm from the state that contains (?) mumbai in India and we make a dish called kharvas from colostrum. Its quite mild and delicious and I think uses only sugar and a bit of cardamom and nutmeg powder sprinkled on top. I think it's steamed so it looks almost like flan but with a denser mouthfeel.

posted by gayatri on 2008-06-02 16:11:49
view gayatri's profile

If the main point is the health benefit and not any sort of taste, I'd probably just hide it in a smoothie/shake type concoction. Although gayatri's suggestion does sound interesting.

posted by Leah Hope on 2008-06-02 17:51:58
view Leah Hope's profile

Not homogenized. The website warns that it may be pink from the blood in the milk. And there are cows on the family ranch. The calves are kept with the mothers for a while. And the milk is just used in Foster Farms milk. So one would assume that they are allowed to on an organic, free range farm. The reason I didn't use it with my son is because he has an adrenal problem, so even though he has never had anything more serious than a cold, he is not healthy. So unpasturized milk would be too dangerous.

posted by charmesh on 2008-06-02 18:15:49
view charmesh's profile

Aaaannnnnnd.... yet another reason to take the road to veganism.

This is why I can't support the dairy industry - you are stealing breastmilk from a baby animal who will then be killed in the near future for its tender flesh.

It would be melodramatic if it weren't TRUE.

posted by Joy R. on 2008-06-02 22:28:07
view Joy R.'s profile

Why in the world would you want to consume this? It's good for calves, so therefore it must be good for humans? If that's the "logic," it's pretty lame, I'm afraid.

posted by STH on 2008-06-02 22:32:51
view STH's profile

jooly and Joy: the calves aren't necessarily being sent for veal. The females would be raised for dairy. The number of male calves born on a dairy farm is less than 50%. And the veal calves ARE usually milk fed. Never heard of "milk fed veal"? Some of the males are raised for beef, not veal, as well. (Not that you'll see that as much better, but they get to live longer than 6 weeks.)

I doubt they're stealing the breastmilk from the calves. Colostrum is only produced for the first few days, and, regardless of what will happen to the calf, they usually stay with the mother for that long. Especially on a family farm - if you google this company, you'll find that they are an organic family farm, not a factory farm.

Please understand that a newborn calf only needs one or 2 gallons of colostrum per day, and the mother is producing at 5-10 gallons a day.

posted by cara_mia on 2008-06-02 23:14:01
view cara_mia's profile

Information about how much colostrum a calf needs and how it loses it's benefits to the newborn can be found here.

posted by cara_mia on 2008-06-02 23:15:39
view cara_mia's profile

I really hope this doesnt find a market and catch on with the soccer mom crowd. The thought of the industry keeping up a wide supply of this stuff frightens me. Im not a milk drinker, but at least milk production isnt as hard on the body as constant pregnancy.

posted by SleepyDweller on 2008-06-03 09:05:55
view SleepyDweller's profile

That's just so ... sad. That should be drunk by a calf, from its mom.

posted by CleanSimple on 2008-06-03 15:27:55
view CleanSimple's profile

I'm so surprised by the knee jerk reactions to this post. Follow Julie's link and you will read from a relatively reputable (althought alternative) nutritional source that colostrum has been consumed in other countries (including India and in England!). And how can people continue to say things like this is "sad" when people with more knowledge than us have already testified that the cow produces far more than a calf will need? Bizarre responses. So strange that people would feel more comfortable drinking non-organic non-family farm friendly milk than organic family-farm friendly colostrum.

posted by juliaonhamilton on 2008-06-04 15:01:41
view juliaonhamilton's profile

well, too late for this go around, but since you asked, the traditonal yorkshire dessert called a curd tart is, when made properly, made with bislings milk

it's bloody lovely too.

posted by ninjacodemonkey on 2008-06-05 10:53:15
view ninjacodemonkey's profile
Buy Text Ads