This morning I sat down at my desk with a mug of hot chocolate and a giant gummy tarantula left over from Halloween. I settled in and opened my weekly Goop email from Gwyneth Paltrow, which was all about breaking the addiction to sugar. Awesome, hopefully no one else could see what I was eating for breakfast.
In my own life, I've learned to fight against the constant battle of sugars making their way into my body. Once I was educated enough to know what forms sugar took in the products I was consuming I made a concerted effort to cut back and at one point, went 100% cold turkey.
Like any addict will tell you, it was the worst four weeks of my life. I was grumpy, irritable, tired, shaky and all I could think of was a big bowl of fresh pasta or brownies, delicious brownies. After I was able to finally break free from the cravings and withdrawal, I was really able to take a step back and see how it had impacted my life. I didn't especially overload on any of the different forms of sugar, but like a smoker, I had to have my fix every few hours, even if it was just a small amount and I didn't see it.
"In the past generation we’ve seen the amount of sugar we consume grow exponentially. Until recently, we had been eating sugar mainly found naturally in foods. It was used as a treat or in small quantities and was never a problem. But today, over a third of the calories we consume come from sugar or white flour, which is highly refined and acts just like sugar in our system. Our bodies cannot cope with such an enormous load. Sugar gives you an initial high, then you crash, then you crave more, so you consume more sugar. It’s this series of highs and lows that provoke unnecessary stress on your adrenals. You get anxious, moody (sugar is a mood-altering drug) and eventually you feel exhausted."
Gwyneth is bringing this problem to the limelight like many other chefs and nutritionists have been trying to do for years. In this morning's email, she shares some words from Doctor Frank Lipman who shares 19 ways to help break the sugar habit. You can check out the full list over at Goop, along with a great story about cocaine addicted rats who chose to drink sugar water over cocaine laced water, that's how powerful it is! Here's a few favorites from the Lipman's list:
• Eat Regularly: Eat three meals and two snacks or five small meals a day. For many people, if they don’t eat regularly, their blood sugar levels drop, they feel hungry and are more likely to crave sweet sugary snacks.
• Protein + Fat at Every Meal: This helps control blood sugar levels. Make sure they are healthy sources of each.
• Choose Whole Foods: The closer a food is to its original form, the less processed sugar it will contain. Food in its natural form, including fruits and vegetables, usually presents no metabolic problems for a normal body, especially when consumed in variety.
• Supplements: Take a good quality multivitamin and mineral supplement, Vitamin D3 and omega 3 fatty acids. Nutrient deficiencies can make cravings worse and the fewer nutrient deficiencies, the fewer cravings. Certain nutrients seem to improve blood sugar control including chromium, Vitamin B3 and magnesium.
• Sugar In Disguise: Remember that most of the “complex” carbohydrates we consume like bread, bagels and pasta aren’t really complex at all. They are usually highly refined and act just like sugars in the body and are to be avoided.
Hit up the Goop newsletter for all the tips, including a few ways to kill an instant craving so you don't cave to what your body tries to tell you! It's a slippery slope that many of us are on, especially if sweets or treats were given as a reward or prize while growing up. The addiction starts early on and it's not easy to see until you try to give it all up and work it back into your eating habits healthfully.
Related: How Does a Food-Lover Maintain a Healthy Weight?
(Image: Flickr member Terwilliger911 licensed for use by Creative Commons, LA Times, lovetheday)
Red-and-Pink-Stripe...

Can we add to that list: avoid images of delicious, sugary cupcakes? Alternatively, do you have the recipe for those cupcakes? Mmmmm...
How do you fight against a battle?
Some of this I agree with, and some I don't. I don't think cutting out sugar and white flour complete is a good idea at all. Those shakes you feel, that's not withdraw symptoms, that's your body needing energy to run it's daily processes. Sure, your body will start to burn fat instead, but it takes a lot longer to convert fat into usable energy. If you're an active person, you need some simple sugars and carbs to give your body quick energy. I agree most people have way too much, but I don't think anyone should cut it out completely, that just sounds like one of those stupid fad diets.
I agree with the above commenter - we're hard wired to like sweet things. We certainly have too much refined sugar in our lives, but a little is necessary.
I think of all people Gwyneth Paltrow is not someone I would look to for advice. I agree sugar is a problem now but she is pretty extreme in my opinion. She used to eat a macrobiotic diet and she has been frighteningly thin in some points of her career. I think she may have a bad relationship with food and maybe shouldn't be giving advice on this topic.
Don't fruits have sugars in them? I would imagine that getting healthy sugars (is that a thing?) would be okay.
I also recently read that Gwyneth Paltrow has a bone thinning problem due to Vitamin D deficiency. Let's eat our cupcakes in the sun!
I agree that we Americans eat way too many refined carbs, but Gwyneth is not my idea of a reliable source of health info.
Yeah, I'm all for cutting out processed foods, sodas, and tons of added sugar, but I'm feeling no guilt for eating a tablespoon of brown sugar in my steel cut oats this morning or eating penne with roasted veggies last night.
@caliH - exactly.
While too much sugar is bad for you (and certain types of sugars are worse than others), it's a necessary part of the diet.
Just think of this -
Your brain represents 2% of your body weight.
It receives 15% of your cardiac output (blood).
It consumes 20% of the oxygen you breathe in.
... and it uses 25% of your glucose.
- most importantly, the brain almost-exclusively relies on simple sugars for energy. Anything too big and too complex simply can't fit into the brain cells.
Cutting out sugars/carbs is the basis of the Atkins diet. While, short-term, it might help you lose weight, your body will actually start breaking down muscle (eating itself, essentially) if it doesn't get enough "easy" energy.
It's better to eat a balanced diet - consult a nutritionist (not a celebrity) if you have questions.
spot on, CaliH!
I also become just the teeeniest bit bitter when celebrities give advice. I'm pretty sure I'd eat ANYTHING that a private chef put in front of me, given that I didn't have to shop for, prepare, or clean up the aftermath of it.
OK--too much sugar = bad. Yes. Agreed. But I cannot take your claims at face value once I read this phrase: (sugar is a mood-altering drug).
No, it's not. Nor is it toxic. A mood-altering drug is...a mood-altering drug. Alcohol is classed as a drug. So is caffeine. Sugar is not.
A toxin is poisonous. Sugar is not toxic. Arsenic is toxic. Pure nicotine is a powerful toxin and a mood-altering drug all in one.
Too much sugar is bad for you. For some people, maybe just a little sugar is too much. I don't know. Maybe your system is so sensitive that a bowl of pasta causes you trouble. That could certainly be true for a very small segment of the population.
Most people DO eat too much sugar. But most people are not going to wig out because they ate white pasta. That's just not a fact.
P.S. No way in hell is taking a multivitamin going to have an impact on sugar cravings.
@cmcinnyc Spot on! Although I was going to say, yeah, sugar's a "mood altering drug" alright, but so are all foods if you use the definition of drug that says a drug is a substance that causes changes in the body when consumed.
Also, celebs are not qualified to give health advice. Period.
If you're eating a well-rounded diet, supplements are unneccessary.
I'm not an alarmist, and if i don't like the post, i'll generally just skip it. However, I really cringe when AT/Kitchn takes a stab at "dietary advice," rather than "how to cook beets," etc. I worry about readers who are unhealthy and unhappy and not skeptical enough of say, Gwyneth Paltrow. Great actress; not a nutritionist.
Dr. Lipman - and Ms. Paltrow - are selling products. Follow the links and see for yourself.
Sugar is lousy in the sense that it increases the amount of calories a person consumes daily which might lead to weight gain if it isn't used up, but that's about it.
Except maybe cavities or something.
People are all afraid of type 2 diabetes and all that, but type 2 diabetes is caused by pressure on the glands caused by excessive weight gain, not sugar. A healthy person can sit and eat a bag of sugar one day but the body would just process it as usual with no permanent consequences...
Both refined white sugar and flour are absolutely horrible for you, and both are toxic. Not in the same sense as arsenic is toxic, more in the sense that drinking a bottle of wine everyday is toxic.
The chemicals used to whiten both of them are horrible for your system. And some of the additives in white flour are banned in other countries as food items.(ie azodicarbonaminde is used to strengthen gluten in flour, it is banned in china for food products, but they use it to aerate the rubber soles of sneakers)
also the shakes you get from quitting sugar cold turkey have nothing to do with your body not being able to create glucose. It is a withdrawl. I'm not saying that sugar is a drug, it's not. But it is addictive. It reacts with the feel good receptors in your brain causing you to feel content. You can get addicted to this.
If you continue to eat whole grains and proper starches your body will break them down into the neseccary glucose needed to survive without having to use your stored energy(fat) and you won't be feeding your sugar habit.
If you classify sugar as addictive, then we would also have to say that taking a walk of hugging a loved one is addictive. All those activities will release dopamine, but somehow I don't see any "lifestyle experts" getting behind the "don't hug your kids" idea.
Also, @cmcinnyc: Holy shit, someone actually used toxin and toxic correctly! You do not know how happy that makes me.
I would just like to mention here that this is quite an ironic post considering how heavy this site is on cookies, cakes, candies, and, yes, cupcakes. (With a very hefty side of bacon!)
Bacon is not toxic. Bacon is love.
It's probably sound advice, but I can see why people resent being lectured about food by a woman who clearly eats next to nothing.
After reading the Kitchn for 2 years, this post made me actually get an account so I could comment. One of the reasons that I love this site is that it has such a balanced approach to food; it should bring pleasure to our lives, rather than being a source of guilt and shame. I truly feel that North Americans have a toxic relationship with food; it's either "good" or "bad".
And taking dietary or health advice from a woman who does have ostopenia at 37, the precursor condition to osteoporosis (and is probably due to a lifetime of dieting)... is not something that I'd want to do.
Yes, excessive consumptive of white sugar is not a good thing (if nothing else, for the high caloric density and for our teeth)... but addiction? That's not what I come to the Kitchn to read.
OK... rant over!
tinyvoices- believe it or not you aren't getting all the vitamins you need with a well balanced diet. I now take a vitamin D3 supplement mainly because I work in the dark all day but my doctor told me unless you work and play all day long in the sun, your body never gets what it needs of D3 and its needed to keep your immune system in top shape and studies show women who get the right amount have way less developments of cancer down the line (from what I remember her saying) My point is, I still do think a multivitamin is good.
And I agree with most on here- ever since I saw Gwenyth start her goop bull, I just roll my eyes at her. I'd take her advice on how to drop a quick 30 lbs for a movie roll, not what to put in my body.
I do agree with all angles of this conversation, however, I think it's funny how defensive people get when someone calls out the negative effects of the foods we love. I know I'm one of them!
poo-pooing the connection between refined sugar and diabetes strikes me as nuts. type-2 diabetes is created by habitual abuse of sugar consumption. ingesting things with high glycemic indexes frequently enough to create insulin resistance in yourself. the weight gain is incidental to the sugar consumption (and attendant calorie glut) and further exacerbates your hormonal issues connected to secreting/using insulin.
my mom came home with a diabetes diagnosis when i was 16. it meant nothing to my skinny little self. at 27, i read a little book called "the south beach diet" which thoroughly explained the process of creating type-2 diabetes in oneself. i recognized i had exactly those eating habits. if only someone had bothered to explain it to me in high school. the perniciousness of diabetes has eaten away my mother's heart, kidneys and eyes. she is 57 years old.
the ease with which the american lifestyle can lead to type-2 diabetes cannot be overstated. anyone who falls into a high-risk group should realize that it isn't just a statistic, it is a fact.
and many people are not in good health, so eating a bag of sugar would be really stupid. i've seen people offer candy to homeless people begging for food (in nyc). candy is not food. it's an edible toy with no nutritive value. it has calories, but the sugar spike will leave a hungry person feeling drowsy, exhausted and much hungrier in 20 minutes.
beefing with gwyneth just b/c of who she is is childish. that article has ideas that have been republished repeatedly. if it reaches someone who's finally at a place where they can hear the wakeup call, then it was worth the click.
I agree that too much sugar is not a good thing, but I refuse to take advice on food from a twig. Sorry, but I love food and eat it in moderation. If cutting out sugar means that I get to look like an anorexic person, forget it. I like some meat on my bones and SOME curves. I don't see sit in front of the television and eat sugar packets one after the other, but I am also not going to cut it out altogether.
If we take possible toxicity and addictive qualities away from refined white flour and sugar, we are still left with nutritionally empty calories that sap energy.
I am a big believer in moderation and prefer to avoid guilt inducing restrictions. It really helps that I am able enjoy all kinds of foods, even the healthy variety.
When I eat anything, I think about the temple (my body) and what am I offering it. Frankly, cupcakes seldom make it into the offering basket, but dark chocolate with almonds, walnuts, and/or fruit are offered regularly...and the same goes for oatmeal and vegetable-laden pasta al dente.
As a society at large, we need to re-think our relationship to food (simple sugars included) in a myriad of ways, if not for our own sake then for future generations.
I applaud the Kitchn, Mrs. Paltrow and Dr. Lipman for bringing this important topic into the dialog.
Too much of anything is not good. Everything in moderation according to its relative nutritional value is what you want. There is no need for people to be so extreme about diet if they are healthy and have no concerns that prohibit various foods.
I've lived in Japan for 21 years and not one person I have spoken with about food (and I've talked to many people of different ages and backgrounds) has said that sugar is the devil's spawn and to be avoided at all costs. Everyone loves a wide range of foods and many of them eat a little candy or ice cream everyday. ("A little" = a single portion size or about two or three bites). They even put a little sugar in most of their savory foods like sembei, stews, etc.
Illnesses and obesity spring from dietary imbalances, not from eating one particular food in moderation. Extremist thinking only opens people up to the psychological problems that come along with eating disorders. Of course, if you want to sell something, that is exactly the sort of thinking you want people to have because unhappy people will try to buy what you have to sell in order to find some sort of peace in their relationship with food.
This isn't the sort of post I read the Kitchn for, and I'd like to express a desire to see less (or no more) of it. This is merely my opinion, of course.
I don't understand why we have to demonize some foods and act like we don't need them. The fructose in your apple and the starch in your bread will all end up as glucose, which then goes through the biochemical process of ATP synthesis (the "energy" we really mean when we use the word energy). So maybe a piece of candy to a bum isn't the end of the world. The dude will get between 36-38 ATP per molecule of glucose. Better than nothing at all. For the rest of us that can eat on a regular basis, just be moderate, eat balanced meals, cook your own food, and exercise.
Table sugar has been with us since about 350 AD and we've had a great variety of cultures adopt cane sugar in their culinary traditions. So why is it such a big problem now? Is it really the sugar or is the people, the society, the schizophrenic allegiance to the next fad diet, the lack of movement in our lives, the high cost of real food, the little time people have to cooking, and/or overeating that is to blame? We, as Americans are overfed, while other parts of the world can't even meet the basic needs for nutrition. So is it really all about the freaking sugar?
This post is timely for me - I gave up processed white sugar about a month ago. Like many posters above, I still eat honey and fruit, and I eat whole-wheat pasta instead of white pasta. Believe me, it wasn't easy to avoid the orange-frosted cupcakes at Halloween parties. But, I feel more energetic now than I did a month ago, and I've dropped four pounds without changing any other health habits. It works for me, and I like how it makes me feel. Everyone's different, though, and I hope everyone can find a healthy balance that works for them.
I have personally tend to have crazy highs and lows in relationship to sugar and high glycemic foods, and also a history of diabetes in my family. For these reasons, I am attempting to get off the sugar roller coaster, and increase my consumption of vegetables and brown rice, etc. When I am do this, my mood stabalizes, and my energy increases. When I eat little chocolate bars instead (ugh... halloween...), I can't think straight until I have another one, and my energy is all over the place.
Those shakes you feel *are* withdrawl symptoms. It is true that your body is looking for energy, but only because you are at the low point of your sugar roller coaster. My two cents.
I didn't take advice from Gwenyth Paltrow, but from Meghan Telpner, a lovely and lively certified nutritionist with the best books and videos, including one on low glycemic eating in which she explains the body's reaction to high glycemic foods.
http://www.meghantelpner.com/shop/5-days-low-glycemic-eating
Honestly? I've found that when I sort of stop eating something (not consciously, but say I don't buy cookies for a few months) I no longer feel the need to eat it...whereas if I DO have a bag of cookies in the house, I will crave those stupid cookies until there's just crumbs left.
I recently attempted to begin Phase 1 of the South Beach diet, I became physically ill on Day 3, and am still trying to recover. I kind of wonder if me getting sick was influenced by the diet... maybe I was having withdrawal. I am going to start again after I get better, as for now I will continue trying to insert as much healthy whole grains and vegetables and proteins in between my icecream breakfasts and dinners.
When will the love affair between AT and Gwyneth end? Why not an article written by a real nutritionist?
The woman is clearly unhinged: "I've learned to fight against the constant battle of sugars making their way into my body."
pearmelon - I had said your above quote, not Gwyneth. And for me... it's a struggle.
Like Michael Pollan said:
Eat food, not a lot. It's all about moderation. We can eat anything we want, it's just about doing it in moderation.
I read this the same day I read about the professor in Kansas who dropped 27 pounds eating Twinkies; trying to prove that dieting isn't about the quality of calories you eat, but instead is about the quantity of calories you eat.
@arcamp83
The problem is "diet."
You can lose weight dieting, but you'll never change your habits. Losing weight isn't about the next three weeks, it's about the next three decades.
Form good habits. Practice good habits. And then those habits become more than habits. And sure, everyone is allowed a cookie now and then. What the hell is the point of living if I can't enjoy my cookies?
Just found this site....I think I will like the cooking ideas, but I agree, this site is not a Mercola.com, Gwenyth is not someone I would take advice from, Sugar has been the destruction of many a civilization, try reading Sugar Blues if you care to know, By William Duffy, look up orthomolecular medicine, it is addictive, addicts usually go successfully to sugar or carbs to fill those particular screaming receptor sites in the brain. Healing is possible without the cravings, if the cellular structure is allowed to heal with the elements, cell structures that it needs....it is quite a complex mystical and working organism--the brain. We say it all the time..."who in their right mind would do that" precisely...if you want that kind of information, there are other places to look, but the opinions here are just that, not based in critical thinking, reflection, science, deductive reasoning, but on wish and whim. Sugar is nasty! Moderation, with a balanced body. Just google the stuff....and begin a journey that big business, big Pharmaceutical, and others to scary to mention, don't want you to know. They get rich on us being followers, and food is one of their biggest avenues of control. Try fluoride in your water....and tooth products...does NOTHING for teeth, in fact it does, it ruins them...the spots, white and dark are fluoridosis and your bones are weakened in the same way from fluoride, teeth are living and can heal, it seems it is though healthy blood. The mouth is an amazing and sensitive portal to health, but now we are getting into alternative and real health issues, so look up R. Nagel, on healing teeth and gums, Weston A. Price and Nourishing Traditions.....etc....I have probably lost you all a long time ago. This site is about pretty fun treat foods and specialties. Not health. But, if you want to atlk about sugar, try Mercola.com and include the comment threads, and they will take you on an information journey that is true, and eye opening, and requires you to critically think...somehting our educational system was designed in 1903 by Rockefeller and the committee of 10, to in their words, make this country complacent and easy to blindly lead. Break loose, think before you speak, and declare a poison a food.
yes, you can have sugar now and then, but I would make sure mine is not GMO, which changes your dna immediately....and has only been tested on the deaf, dumb and blind American public, as the European communities banned it. And if you are watching...a juidge banned gmo sugar beets untill further notice, but the farmers in Northern Minnesota cannot see anything but what they have done, and they are trying to get it overruled before next spring, you see, GMO and Monsanto make certain that you do not have clean seed, and theirs is determinant, it won't produce live seed...so they have no seed now. Sounds sci-fi...but it is true.
your families get sick on whwt the industrial complex wants to feed you. Agave is just as bad as high fructose corn syrup, now called corn syrup because 10% of us know,and that is big in their profits...but it is not food and will kill you.
suggestions for good sugar are RAW honey from a small farmer you trust, Grade B Maple Syrup, the organic cane sugar...only from a co-op you trust. Fair trade is good. The first two are the best, more natural as God intended, the more refined and whitened, the closer to drugs!
That said, certainly live, but make the bad stuff only once a week....something like that.
SharB, genetically modified organisms may be untested and questionable, but they do not "change your DNA immediately".
And nobody else has commented on this, but I thought I should point out that the "study" Paltrow "references" (although no actual source reference), in her words offered rats the choice between sugar-laced water and INTRAVENOUS cocaine. Going from the information stated in the Paltrow link alone, this cannot be a proper study if the substances were "offered" in 2 very different forms. If the sugar were offered intravenously it would not be a valid option/result since the implications that are being drawn are about sugar and the digestive system, not sugar when injected into the blood. And if it were offered to the rats as a drinkable liquid then any results are invalid because they would be contaminated by the fact that the cocain is intravenous (so without any smell or taste and entirely bypassing the digestive system) and the sugar-water is a food substance, which means the 2 cannot be compared. Plus it is almost impossible to test preference in rats bewteen substances that cannot be smelt before the actual choice to consume is made.
So basically, an invalid study "referenced" to lend scientific credence where there may or may not be any.
Wow. I'm surprised . . . time to get educated people. Sugar IS toxic and highly addictive. Gweneth isn't talking about fruit for god's sake. Have any of you actually experimented with getting off sugar???? Well I did and it's exactly as Gweneth described. It was the hardest thing I have ever done and I will tell you that never in ALL my life, have I felt as healthy as I do now, not even as a child. In fact I lived on sugar as a child and I felt like crap most of the time. Now, my skin glows, I have SO much energy I almost don't know what to do with it all and I lost 12 pounds . . . and those 12 pounds needed to come off. I don't have an unhealthy relationship with food . . . I have a healthy relationship. I've replaced refined foods such as white pastas, breads, muffins etc with more vegetables and healthy proteins and whole grain carbs. And I no longer use sugar as a "pick me up" throughout the day. I'm not saying you should believe everything Gweneth Paltrow says but don't knock her just because she is a movie star. Try it for yourself or at least get of the "judge" train. Just b/c Gweneth is a star doesn't mean she's an idiot.
Agree with many of these points. The body definitely does need simple sugar. But let's face it, most people obviously don't seem to have much trouble with getting enough sugar in their diets.
I don't love Gwyneth either but the advice in this column is the same advice you would receive from a registered dietitian. It's solid advice: eat regularly, eat whole foods, and focus on healthy protein and fat.
I don't think there's anything wrong with having a cupcake for dessert either, but I for one am glad to have the reminder to focus on healthier eating habits.
The focus on protein and fat may not be supported by all dieticians and is not supported by all research. Many dieticians will tell you to focus on whole grains and legumes--lower glycemic index, but carbs, nonetheless. Too much protein and fat are also associated with problems.
Sarahrae, I don't think Pearmelon was talking about the content of that quote, but the fact that someone who writes for a living said "I fight against the battle." (Sussu pointed this out too.)
Maybe... edit this? Not a great look.