I think “local” needs to be redefined in the modern era, because local doesn’t relate to geography any more. If you truly think about the opportunities that you have and the quality of the transportation today, local for me really has to do with the quality... ...of the product. You certainly could get into the argument that local is better because of the transportation costs, how that relates to gasoline prices and the moral impact that we’re having in the Middle East. In relation to the quality of the food, local for me could be California, it could be Maine, it could be Vermont. I mean, in many cases, it is – Diane St. Clair makes her butter once a week and sends it to us the next day. Can I get fresher butter locally? Well, I really can’t.
Quote from interview at The Gilded Fork.
What do you think? It seems like he's arguing here that local really means artisan - who is the best artisan, making the most authentic and artisanal product? Is that a legitimate way to approach local food? Or is local, to you, defined purely in terms of geography?